Inferring Electre's veto-related parameters from outranking examples
نویسندگان
چکیده
When considering Electre s valued outranking relations, aggregation/disaggregation methodologies have difficulties in taking discordance (veto) into account. We present a partial inference procedure to compute the value of the vetorelated parameters that best restore a set of outranking statements (i.e., examples that an Electre model should restore) provided by a decision maker, given fixed values for the remaining parameters of the model. This paper complements previous work on the inference of other preference-related parameters (weights, cutting level, category limits, . . .), advancing toward an integrated framework of inference problems in Electre III and Tri methods. We propose mathematical programs to infer veto-related parameters, first considering only one criterion, then all criteria simultaneously, using the original version of Electre outranking relation and two variants. This paper shows that these inference procedures lead to linear programming, 0–1 linear programming, or separable programming problems, depending on the case. 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
A note on the asymmetric part of an outranking relation
This note discusses the properties of the asymmetric part of an outranking relation a la ELECTRE. Such relations have been used in the pseudodisjunctive version of ELECTRE TRI-B. We show that they have properties that are somewhat di erent from the ones of outranking relations. Indeed, contrary to outranking relations, they allow to have at the same time veto and bonus e ects. We suggest that t...
متن کاملHandling effects of reinforced preference and counter-veto in credibility of outranking
The aim of this paper is to generalize the way of computing the credibility of outranking in a multiple criteria aggregation procedure, in view of taking into account two new effects called reinforced preference and counter-veto. These effects concern only those criteria for which, as soon as action a is “judged very strongly preferred” to action b, one wishes that the credibility of outranking...
متن کاملOn polarizing outranking relations with large performance differences
We introduce a bipolarly extended veto principle – a positive, as well as negative, large performance differences polarization – which allows us to extend the definition of the classical outranking relation in such a way that the identity between its asymmetric part and its codual relation is preserved.
متن کاملIntegrating expert knowledge into kernel-based preference models
In multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) and fuzzy modeling, preference models are typically constructed by interacting with the human decision maker (DM). When the DM experiences difficulties to specify precise for all parameters of the model, inference and elicitation procedures can assist him/her to find a satisfactory model and to assess unlabelled examples. In a related but more statistica...
متن کاملInteractive Aggregation/Disaggregation Dichotomic Sorting Procedure for Group Decision Analysis Based on the Threshold Model
In this paper, a new multi-criteria decision-making procedure is presented, which captures preferential information in the form of the threshold model. It is based on the ELECTRE-like sorting analysis restricted by the localization principle, which enables high adaptability of the decision model and reduces the cognitive load imposed on the decision-makers. It lays the foundation for the introd...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- European Journal of Operational Research
دوره 170 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006